Petitioners filed a writ petition challenging revenue orders but applied for withdrawal due to an amicable settlement between parties. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7098/2006
----Petitioners
Versus
All by caste Brahmins, resident of Durga Nursery Road, Near Hasti Mata Mandir, Udaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Joshi for Mr. Vikram Singh. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hukum Singh. Mr. Vijay Rajpurohit for Mr. Sandeep Saruparia.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
06/12/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that an application has been filed for withdrawal of the writ petition on the ground that the parties have amicably settled the matter by compromise.
(2 of 2) [CW-7098/2006]
For the reasons mentioned in the application for withdrawal of the writ petition, the same is allowed.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
5-AnilSingh/-
M/s Devganga Corporation
Rakesh Suhalka
The Board of Revenue, Rajasthan
The Revenue Appellate Authority
The Sub Divisional Officer
Smt. Padu Kanwar
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
