The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application for want of prosecution as neither the petitioner nor any legal representative appeared on behalf on the day of hearing.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9176/2022
Sanjay Singh Son Of Shri Shadiram, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Tarwala Police Station And Tehsil Kishangarhbas District Alwar.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Order
06/12/2022
On the last occasion i.e. on 18.11.2022, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner and today also learned counsel for the petitioner neither appeared physically nor connected through video conferencing.
Hence, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
Ashish Kumar /76
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application can be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the petitioner?
Sanjay Singh Son Of Shri Shadiram
State Of Rajasthan
Chandra Kumar Songara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
