Allowed

Virendra Singh S/O Himmat Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 May 2022CRLMB/5537/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC in an NDPS case. The High Court granted anticipatory bail, conditioning release on a personal bond and sureties, ensuring availability for investigation and non-interference with witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on anticipatory bail via personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each; conditions to appear for investigation, not leave India, and not interfere with evidence.

Virendra Singh S/O Himmat Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5537/2022

¶3

Virendra Singh S/o Himmat Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Beda Banki ( Bhuri Ka Pura Beda) P.s. Sadar Hindaun City Karauli

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya UR Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA Order

¶10

09/05/2022

¶11

This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 292/2021 registered at Police Station Hindaun City, District Karauli for the offences under Sections 8/21 and 8/29 of NDPS Act.

¶12

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the petitioner and he has been made an accused only on the basis of police statement of the coaccused. As per rejection bail order, he has no criminal antecedents. The bail application of co-accused Abhishek Beniwal under Section 439 of CrPC has already been granted by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.07.2021. Hence, the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be granted.

¶13

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-5537/2022]

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

¶17

material available on record.

¶18

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

¶19

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner-Virendra Singh S/o Himmat Singh in the aforesaid FIR, the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of concerned SHO/IO on the following conditions:

¶20

i) That the petitioner will make himself available for the investigation as and when required by the investigation officer.

¶21

ii) That the petitioner will not leave India without permission of the Court.

¶22

iii) That the petitioner will not temper with the evidence or threaten or pressurize the witnesses in the case.

¶23

(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J

¶24

PAYAL/57

Virendra Singh S/O Himmat Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Virendra Singh S/O Himmat Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Sharma S/O Pramod Kumar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Madan Lal Son of Shri Richpal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ranjeet S/O Rameshwar Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Babulal Meena S/O Chotelal Vs State of Rajasthan

Samadarlal S/O Jaisaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Omprakash Son of Shri Shyamlal Vs State of Rajasthan