The High Court of Rajasthan allowed an interlocutory application to convert the ongoing D.B. Crim. Leave to Appeal into a victim appeal under Section 372 CrPC, citing Supreme Court precedent.
Application accepted to treat leave to appeal as a victim's appeal under Section 372 CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
D.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 11/2022
Banshilal
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
04/03/2022
The interlocutory application filed to treat the instant leave to appeal application as victim’s appeal under Section 372 CrPC is accepted for reasons mentioned therein and in light of the Supreme Court’s judgment in the case of Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) through Lrs. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. reported in AIR 2018 SC 5206 . An amended cause title be filed within seven days. Office to proceed.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
16-Pramod/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim leave to appeal should be treated as a victims appeal under Section 372 CrPC in light of the Supreme Courts decision in Mallikarjun Kodagali
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) through Lrs. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors.Applied¶12
AIR 2018 SC 5206 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Banshilal
State Of Rajasthan
Sandeep Mehta
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
