The petitioner alleged that the order impugned in the writ petition has been complied with. Justice Dinesh Mehta found no need to continue the contempt proceedings as compliance was made and discharged the notices of contempt. The peti
Notices of contempt discharged; contempt petition disposed of for statistical purposes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 162/2020
Laxman Singh Karnawat S/o Late Bhanwar Lal Karnawat, Aged About 78 Years, Resident Of 60-D, Panchwati, Udaipur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Purohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sunil Beniwal, AAG with Mr. Saransh Vij Mr. Deelip Kawadia
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
10/12/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due compliance of the order, non-compliance whereof has been alleged, has been made.
In view of the aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to continue
with the present contempt proceedings.
Notices of contempt are hereby discharged.
The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical purposes.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
114-Amar/-
Laxman Singh Karnawat
State Of Rajasthan
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
