The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a writ petition challenging the examination schedule for training institute students. The petition was dismissed without a separate order as the Director General of Training had already secured an extended schedule for the batch.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17319/2021
Marwar Private Industrial Training Institute, Through Its Principal Shri Mahendra Singh S/o Shri Mangilal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Near Maharaja Hotel, Khokhriya, Main Banar Road, District Jodhpur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bheru Lal Jat Mr. Himmat Jagga For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, ASG Mr. Manish Vyas, AAG with Mr. Kailash Choudhary
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
10/12/2021
(2 of 2)
[CW-17319/2021]
General of Training before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in W.P(C) No.13973/2021; 13974/2021; 13975/2021; 13978/2021.
6. After due consideration of all the above mentioned facts and circumstances and also keeping in view of the failure of Trainees, the competent authority of DGT has decided to provide the necessary data upload/trainee verification/approval links in NIMI/NCVT MIS portal for this batch of left over trainees, in a Separate extended schedule, tentatively from 14.12.2021 for 15 days. The examinations for this batch of Trainees shall be conducted in separate schedule. The exam schedule will be intimated at a later date.”
(DINESH MEHTA),J
109-Ramesh/-
Marwar Private Industrial Training Institute
State Of Rajasthan
Rajasthan Council For Vocational Education And Training
Director, Technical Education (Polytechnics)
Director General Of Training
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
