The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the second bail application because the petitioner's counsel did not press the application but sought liberty to file a fresh one later.
Liberty to file a fresh bail application after recording of statement of seizure officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No.
1364/2021
Ghanshyam S/o Shri Durga Ram, Aged About 29 Years, r/o Baag Ki Dhani, Bilara, Tehsil Bilara, District Jodhpur. (Lodged In District Jail, Merta).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B Ray Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
17/03/2021
In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this criminal misc. second bail application, but seeks liberty for the petitioner to file fresh bail application after recording of statement of seizure officer.
Accordingly, this criminal misc. second bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as prayed for.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
110-Sudheer/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioner when the bail application is not pressed by his counsel.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ghanshyam S/o Shri Durga Ram
State Of Rajasthan
DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
