The High Court dismissed an S.B. Civil Restoration Application as not pressed, noting that counsel for the appellants submitted that the original suit had already been decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 1028/2011
3- HkS: iq= Nhrj fuoklh ekpj[kkuh] rglhy Qqysjk ftyk t;iqj
-----vihykFkkhZx.k
cuke
fuoklh <k.kh ukxku rutkscusj rglhy Qqysjk ftyk t;iqj
(2 of 2) [CRES-1028/2011]
12Jherh Hkwjh ifRu LoxhZ; /khlkyky fuoklh xksMksokyh dksBh] lqukjksa dh cxhph ds ikl tkscusj ftyk t;iqj
-----jsLiksUMsUV
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghvendra singh for Mr. Bhanu Pareek For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
21/10/2021
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the original suit has been decided. Hence, he does not press the restoration application. The same is dismissed as not pressed.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
SAURABH/14
Jitendra Singh
Devraj Singh
Advocate Jashvanth Lal
Advocate Raghvendra Singh
Rajasthan Board of Vocational Education and Training
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
