The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. holding that no case for bail was made out as the charge sheet identified the petitioner.
Second bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 16571/2021
Hemant Kumar S/o Shri Ramchandra Jat, R/o Vill. Sewa Ps Sadar Sikar Dist. Sikar Raj. At Present Confine In Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana Dist. Sikar
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Gadwal for Mr. Vijay Poonia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ramesh Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
20/10/2021
This second bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.141/2018 registered at Police Station, Ranoli, District Sikar for offence under Section(s) 394, 323 of IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the entire material available on record.
The charge-sheet has been filed wherein it is apparent that the petitioner has been identified by Vikram.
In view thereof, no case for bail is made out. The second
bail application is dismissed.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
SAURABH/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail is maintainable in the second application when the charge sheet identifies the petitioner and no case is made out.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Hemant Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
