Counsel for appellant submitted the appeal became infructuous. The High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur dismissed the appeal under those circumstances and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 640/2020
Sunil Kumar S/o Namaloom., Aged About 41 Years, Owner Of Gauki Ice-Cream Factory, Mela Ka Chauraha, Near Gangabagh, Bandikui Road, Rajgarh (Alwar )
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Gupta for Mr. Ghanshyam Das Bansal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
22/10/2021
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal has been rendered infructuous.
In view of above, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
SAURABH/5
Sunil Kumar S/o Namaloom
Polyaram S/o Shri Ghasi Ram
Kamla Devi W/o Polyaram
Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited
Chairman, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
