Prabhu Dayal and Ors. v. Vijai Lal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This court held that the Special Civil Application abated in all respondent legs. The Appellants failed to bring on record the legal representatives of a deceased respondent, violating Order 22 Rule 4 CPC. Following Supreme Court principles, the matter was consigned to the record as abated.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Misc. Appeal is set aside as abated against the respondent legs involving the deceased and consigned to the record.
What the court decided
(1 of 2)
[CMA-1267/2004]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1267/2004
- Prabhu Dayal Son of Girdhari Lal
- Ramesh Chand Son of Shri Prabhu Dayal
- Damodar Son of Shri Prabhu Dayal
All residents of Bamanwas, Tehsil Sawai Madhopur.
…..Applicant-Appellants
Versus
- Vijai Lal Son of Shri Bhoriya Meena.
- Chiranji Son of Shri Bhikha.
- Ramji Lal Son of Shri Nannu Lal.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the special civil application abates due to failure to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased respondent?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Prabhu Dayal
- appellant
Ramesh Chand
- appellant
Damodar
- respondent
Vijai Lal
- respondent
Chiranji
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/1267/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court