Petitioner withdrew a criminal miscellaneous petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granted a stay, and clarified no liberty was given to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.709/2020
Balram S/o Girraj, Aged 27 Years, R/o Balaheda, Tehsil Mahuwa, District Dausa, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Chand Dewanda For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
05/06/2020
After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the instant criminal misc. petition.
The criminal misc. petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
It is made clear that arguments were heard at length and this court was inclined to dismiss the petition whereafter counsel for the petitioner has withdrawn the petition and therefore no liberty is granted to file a fresh petition.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
Karan Bhutani /43
Balram S/o Girraj
State Of Rajasthan
Urmila W/o Ramcharan
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
