Fateh Singh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application by directing the trial court to consider the petitioners' case in light of the Manohar Lal Saini judgment and release them on bail strictly in accordance with the law.
What did the court decide?
Directed the trial court to consider the petitioners' case in light of Manohar Lal Saini judgment and release them on bail in accordance with law.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 477/2020
- Fateh Singh S/o Gopal Singh, Aged About 63 Years, By Caste Rajput, Retd Asi, Resident Of Ghodaghati, Nathdwara Police Station, District Rajsamand.
- Ramchandra Yadav S/o Panna Lal Yadav, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Rampura, Tehsil Nathdwara, District Rajsamand, Presently/then Asi Of Semari Police Station, Udaipur, Dist. Udaipur.
- Jitendra Kumar S/o Hazari Lal, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Dangiawas, Dist. Jodhpur, The Then Constable Of Gogunda Police Station, Dist. Udaipur.
- Kishan Singh S/o Ranjeet Singh Jhalla, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Pipaliya, Tehsil Nathdwara, Distt. Rajsamand, The Then Constable Of Gogunda Police Station, Udaipur, District Udaipur.
----Petitioners
| State, Through Pp | Versus |
|---|---|
| ----Respondent | |
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. M.S. Rajpurohit |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be disposed of with a direction to the trial court to release the petitioners on bail in accordance with the Manohar Lal Saini judgment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Fateh Singh S/o Gopal Singh
- petitioner
Ramchandra Yadav S/o Panna Lal Yadav
- petitioner
Jitendra Kumar S/o Hazari Lal
- petitioner
Kishan Singh S/o Ranjeet Singh Jhalla
- respondent
State
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/477/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court