Mukesh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought liberty to file a fresh bail application after recording witness statements. The High Court upheld this request and dismissed the present Section 439 Cr.P.C. application.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 386/2020
Mukesh S/o Shravan Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, By Caste Nayak, R/o. Araaiwali, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh (Raj.). (Lodged In The Central Jail, Hanumangarh).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
| ----Respondent | ||
|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. Harish Kumar Purohit |
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. S. K. Bhati, PP assisted by Mr. Ravindra Khichi |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order
13/02/2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. and seeks liberty to file fresh bail application after recording the statement of the material witnesses before the learned trial Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mukesh S/o Shravan Kumar
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/386/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court