Allowed

Babu Khan @ Yakub Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Feb 2020CRLMB/194/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge of Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur on 13/02/2020 allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner accused in an NDPS Act case. The accused was directed to execute a personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail executing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Babu Khan @ Yakub Khan Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 194/2020

¶3

Babu Khan @ Yakub Khan S/o Taju Khan, Aged About 47 Years, B/c Kayamkhani, R/o Ward No. 18 Meghwalo Ka Mohalla, Bidasar Bodas, Police Thana Bidasar, Dist. Churu (Raj.). (Presently Lodged At District Jail, Bhilwara).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan

		----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. B. R. Godara
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. S. K. Bhati, PP assisted by Mr. Ravindra Khichi

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶9

Order

¶10

13/02/2020

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.208/2019, Police Station Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara for the offences under Sections 8/15 & 29 of NDPS Act.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except the statement of the co-accused(principal accused), there is no other evidence to implicate the present petitioner in the offence alleged in the present case. He further submits that there is no case of the like nature pending or decided against the petitioner. The charge-sheet in the matter has been filed. The conclusion of trial

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-194/2020]

¶16

will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶18

Accordingly, the present bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Babu Khan @ Yakub Khan S/o Taju Khan shall be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. No.208/2019, Police Station Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees: One Lac Only) with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶19

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶20

2-SunilS/-

Babu Khan @ Yakub Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babu Khan @ Yakub Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amar Singh Vs State

Basant Vs State

Rohit @ Chunnu Meghwal (Solanki) Vs State

Yogendra Kumar Vs State

Bablu Vs State

Rahul Vs State