Allowed

Balkesh @ Aluda v. State

Rajasthan HC7 Jan 2020CRLMB/15027/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the bail application of the petitioner, who was in custody for offences under the Arms Act. The petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 along with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Balkesh @ Aluda Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15027/2019

¶3

Balkesh @ Aluda S/o Satbir, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Nanda Ka Bas, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu. (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Rajgarh).

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through P.p.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Bijarnia. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶10

Order

¶11

07/01/2020

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.289/2019, Police Station- Hamirwas District Churu for the offence under Section 3/25 of Arms Act.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the charge sheet has already been filed in the matter. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶15

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail.

¶16

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-15027/2019]

¶19

the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

¶20

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Balkesh @ Aluda S/o Satbir arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.289/2019, P.S. Hamirwas District Churu shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees : Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶22

18-Anil Singh/-

Balkesh @ Aluda v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balkesh @ Aluda v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madan Vs State

Narpat Ram Vs State

Deepak Rupela Vs State

Kuldeep Vs State

Arvind Lunkar Vs State

Shrawan Kumar Vs State