Deepak Rupela v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Rajasthan High Court allowed the petitioner's bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., ordering his release from custody pending the conclusion of the trial in the quashed FIR case.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner allowed bail to appear on bail of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 41/2020
Deepak Rupela S/o Shri Dhanraj, Aged About 45 Years, By Caste Punjabi Rupela R/o House No. 10/28, Mukta Prasad Colony, Police Station Naya Shahar, District Bikaner. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner).
----Petitioner
Versus
| State, Through Pp | ----Respondent |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) |
: Mr. Kaushal Gautam. : Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP Mr. Muktesh Maheshwari for the complainant. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
06/01/2020
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.274/2019, Police Station Khajuwala District Bikaner for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 327, 384, 120-B IPC.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in cases of cheating and criminal breach of trust.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Deepak Rupela
- respondent
State
Coram
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/41/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court