Arvind Lunkar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail. Court rejected the application due to gravity of offence but directed trial court to consider bail on same day if petitioner surrenders by a specified date.
What did the court decide?
Direction to trial court to consider bail application same day if petitioner surrenders by 20/01/2020.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15171/2019
Arvind Lunkar S/o Sh. Prem Chand Lunkar, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Lunkad, R/o Lunkar Street, Phalodi, Dist. Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Jagmal Singh Choudhary Sr. |
|---|---|
| Advocate with Ms. Hemlata | |
| Choudhary | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mohd. Javed Gauri,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
07/01/2020
The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with C.R. Case No.190/2018, Police Station Phalodi (Jodhpur) for the offences under Sections 409, 420, 406 and 120-B of IPC.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be extended to the petitioner apprehending arrest.
Whether direction for expedited bail hearing upon surrender should be issued.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arvind Lunkar
- respondent
State
Coram
Vinit Kumar Mathur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/15171/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court