Narpat Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail for Narpat Ram in a case involving rape and POCSO offences. The court ordered release upon furnishing a personal bond with sureties to the trial court.
What did the court decide?
Accused petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each to trial court.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10/2020
Narpat Ram S/o Karna Ram, Aged About 24 Years, B/c Meghwal, R/o Bodana, At Present Chack No. 1,2, 4 Swm, Shakti Nagar, P.s. Nokh, District Jaisalmer (Raj.) (Accused In District Jail, Jaisalmer)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
| ----Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Roshan Lal |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Farzand Ali, AAG cum GA Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
06/01/2020
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with FIR No.47/2019 of Police Station Nokh, District Jaisalmer for the offences under Sections 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application of accused Narpat Ram should be accepted in a case involving offences under Section 376 IPC and POCSO Act.
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail by furnishing a personal bond with sureties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Narpat Ram S/o Karna Ram
- respondent
State
Coram
Vinit Kumar Mathur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/10/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court