Allowed

Bhagwanaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Jan 2020CRLMB/14586/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to four accused persons (father-in-law, mother, sister-in-law, brother-in-law) apprehending arrest in connection with offences under Sections 498A, 406, 354 and 323/143 IPC. The Court allowed the petition, directing release on personal bond with sureties upon arrest.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Bhagwanaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14586/2019

¶3

Bhagwanaram S/o Samartha Ji, Aged About 60 Years,

¶4

Smt. Pakkidevi W/o Bhagwanaram, Aged About 56 Years,

¶5

Smt. Pooja D/o Bhagwanaram, Aged About 23 Years, 4. Suresh Kumar S/o Bhagwanaram, Aged About 19 Years, All above are by Caste Mali, R/o Rampura Colony, Godiji, Tehsil And Dist. Jalore (Raj.)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. KuldeepBishnoi
For Respondent(s)	: Mohd. Javed Gauri,PP

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶12

Order

¶13

07/01/2020

¶14

This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.21/2019, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Jalore for the offences under Sections 498A, 406, 354 and 323/143 of IPC.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the husband of the complainant Kishanlal has already been enlarged on regular bail. The present petitioners are father-in-law, mother-in-law, sister-in-law and brother-in-law of the complainant. The allegation levelled against them are without any substance.

¶17

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMB-14586/2019]

¶20

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioners (1) Bhagwanaram S/o Samartha Ji, (2) Smt. Pakkidevi W/o Bhagwanaram, (3) Smt. Pooja D/o Bhagwanaram & (4) Suresh Kumar S/o Bhagwanaram, in connection with F.I.R. No.21/2019, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Jalore, the petitioners shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/(Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees: Twenty Five Thosuand Only) each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

¶22

(i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

¶24

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶26

121-SanjayS/-

Bhagwanaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagwanaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madan Vs State

Narpat Ram Vs State

Deepak Rupela Vs State

Kuldeep Vs State

Arvind Lunkar Vs State

Shrawan Kumar Vs State