Allowed

Jethmal Singh v. State

Rajasthan HC2 Jan 2020CRLMB/13786/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the petitioner arrested in connection with offences under Sections 447, 323, 324, 325, 326 & 307/34 IPC. The court directed the petitioner to furnish a personal bond and two surety bonds while complying with Section 446 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing one personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two surety bonds of Rs. 25,000 each.

Jethmal Singh Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13786/2019

¶3

Jethmal Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh Rajput, Aged About 36 Years, B/c Rajput, R/o Bhimsar, Mulana, Tehsil Fatehgarh, District Jaisalmer.

¶4

(At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jaisalmer)

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan

		----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Vikas Mishra
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Gaurav Singh,PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶10

Order

¶11

02/01/2020

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.66/2010, Police Station Sangad, District Jaisalmer for the offences under Sections 447, 323, 324, 325, 326 & 307/34 IPC.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

¶14

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is facing trial for the aforesaid offences. He was earlier granted bail but he failed to appear before the trial court on the date fixed for his appearance, therefore, he jumped the bail. The petitioner is ready to submit his bail bonds and shall continue to appear

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-13786/2019]

¶16

before the trial court on each and every date of hearing fixed by the trial court and shall not jump the bail again.

¶17

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail.

¶18

Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced, this Court thinks it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Jethmal Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh Rajput be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. No.66/2010, Police Station Sangad, District Jaisalmer provided he furnishes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs. 25000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is also required to comply with the order passed under Section 446 Cr.P.C.

¶20

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶21

1-Sunils/-/-

Jethmal Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jethmal Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manohar Lal Vs Mahendra Kumar and Anr.

Ravindra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Guman Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohd. Irfan Vs State

Ganga Ram Vs State

Pankaj @ Chandu Vs State