In a writ miscellaneous application seeking reconstitution of an impugned writ petition that had already been decided, the High Court dismissed the application as infructuous.
Misc. Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[WMAP-378/2019]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Misc Application No. 378/2019
Manohar Lal
----Petitioner
Versus
Mahendra Kumar And Anr.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
16/12/2019
The matter comes upon an application (Inward No. 24869/15) for reconstitution of the S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5446/2015. However, during the pendency of this application, the writ petition itself has been decided vide order dated 29.05.2017.
Accordingly, the present Misc. Application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
6-SunilS/-
Manohar Lal
Mahendra Kumar
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
