Allowed

Rekh Singh S/O Dharm Singh B/C Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 May 2020CRLAS/731/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court ordered the release of the appellant on bail, quashed the earlier bail rejection order, and directed the appellant to furnish a bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of similar amount to the trial Judge.

What did the court decide?

Rejection of bail order dated 05.03.2020 quashed; Appeal allowed and accused released on bail with personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and one surety of alike amount.

Rekh Singh S/O Dharm Singh B/C… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Appeal No.731/2020

¶3

Rekh Singh S/o Dharm Singh R/o Saloda Tehsil Gangapur City Police Station Gangapur City Distt. Sawai Madhopur Raj. (Presently Confined In Jail At Sawai Madhopur)

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶6

----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr.Rajneesh Gupta (On Video Conferencing) For Respondent(s) : Mr.Fateh Ram Meena, Public Prosecutor

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR Order

¶8

12/05/2020

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and Public Prosecutor.

¶10

The present criminal appeal under Section 14(A) (2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed in connection with FIR No.417/2019 registered at Police Station Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur.

¶11

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant has been falsely implicated in the case registered under Section 3(2)(va) of the Prevention of Atrocities Act. Learned counsel submitted that all the other offences are bailable and triable by Magistrate.

¶12

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant was khatedar of khasra No.502 and he has sold one plot to complainant Narvada Devi. Learned counsel further submitted

¶13

(2 of 2)

¶14

[CRLAS-731/2020]

¶15

that there is a dispute between the complainant and Ramphool and as such the appellant has no concern with the same.

¶16

Learned counsel submitted that the appellant is in

¶17

custody for more than two and a half months and he is not required for any other purpose.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal.

¶19

This Court considering the allegation levelled against the appellant and custody of the appellant as well as taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to order the release of the appellant on bail.

¶20

The order dated 05.03.2020 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Sawai Madhopur in Bail Application No.46/2020 is quashed and set-aside and this appeal is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-appellant Rekh Singh S/o Dharm Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of alike amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR), J

¶22

Himanshu Soni/375/40

Rekh Singh S/O Dharm Singh B/C Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rekh Singh S/O Dharm Singh B/C Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Ram Meena S/O Shri Batti Lal Meena B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Babulal S/O Surarjmal B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish S/O Nannuram @ Naina B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Meena S/O Shri Ramdhan Meena B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikas Dangi S/O Late Sh. Dharampal Singh B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh S/O Mangturam B/C Ahir Vs State of Rajasthan