The High Court of Rajasthan, Jodhpur dismissed a writ petition filed by three individuals challenging an order dated 25.07.2019 under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, as the petition was not pressed by the learned counsel, with liberty to proceed if a fresh application is filed.
LIBERTY TO FILE FRESH APPLICATION AS ADVISED AS THE ORDER IM pugned WILL NOT CAUSE PREJUDICE.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[CW-12388/2019]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12388/2019
All above are S/o Shri Mohammed Kamaal, R/o Tehsil Chouck, Nagaur (Raj.).
----Petitioners
Versus
Mangi Lal S/o Shri Munnal Lal Agarwal, R/o Baajarwada Mohalla, Nagaur (Raj.).
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Usman Ghani
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
09/12/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present petition. However, he seeks liberty that in the event of filing a fresh application as advised, the order impugned dated 25.07.2019 passed on the application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. will not cause any prejudice to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
4-SunilS-Anil Singh/-
Mohammed Shokat
Chand Mohammed
Kamruddin
Mangi Lal
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
