Bhadar Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In this bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan allowed release of the petitioner on bond citing prosecutrix's statement of voluntariness, age disclosure, and long expected trial duration involving IPC and POCSO charges.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail via personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000 each.
What the court decided
(1 of 2)
[CRLMB-15094/2019]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15094/2019
Bhadar Ram S/o Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 29 Years, By Caste Kumahar, R/o Ward No. 7, Tibbi, District Hanumangarh. (Lodged In Sub District Jail Merta).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Bhawani Singh |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Gaurav Singh,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves bail in a case involving offences under IPC and POCSO Act.
Whether the prosecution statements suggest voluntariness and age discrepancies warrant bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bhadar Ram S/o Shri Banwari Lal
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Vinit Kumar Mathur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/15094/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court