In this single paragraph order, the High Court at Jodhpur disposed of S.B. Civil Writ No. 3459/2019 by directing the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation via a speaking order strictly in accordance with law.
Directed respondents to decide the petitioner's representation by passing a speaking order strictly in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 3459/2019
Pankaj Kanwar W/o Satyendra Pal Singh, Aged About 34 Years, By Caste Rawat, R/o Village Gunga Magri, Barar, Tehsil Bhim, District Rajsamand.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Awar Dan Ujjwal For Respondent(s) : ----
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/04/2019
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if his representation is decided by the respondents by passing a speaking order.
In light of such statements, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
19-Zeeshan/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be directed to have his representation decided by the respondents by passing a speaking order in accordance with law.
Pankaj Kanwar W/o Satyendra Pal Singh
State Of Rajasthan
The Commissioner, Excise, Udaipur, Rajasthan
The Sub Divisional Officer, Bhim, District Rajsamand
The Collector, Rajsamand
The District Excise Officer, Rajsamand
Pusphendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
