The High Court, treating counsel's limited submission to consider the petitioner's representation as a speaking order, disposed of the petition with a direction to respondents to decide it in compliance with law.
Direction to respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation by passing a speaking order strictly in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 1445/2019
Balraj Kumar
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Sunder Paliwal For Respondent(s) : ----
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
01/04/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a limited submission that the petitioner would be satisfied if his representation (Annex.4) may be considered and decided by the respondents by passing a speaking order.
In light of such submission, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking, strictly in accordance with law.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
41-Zeeshan/-
Balraj Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
