Mohd.Arif v. State and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Revising court set aside the conviction and imprisonment for cheque dishonour under Section 138 NI Act, relying on a post-petition compromise accepted by the complainant and Section 147 of the Act.
What did the court decide?
Conviction and sentence of imprisonment awarded under Section 138 NI Act set aside based on compromise.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 231/2015
Mohammad Arif S/o Haji Mohammad Isak Khinchi, By Caste Teli, R/o Ward No. 6, Bhargava Colony, Chand Bas, Sujangarh, District Churu.
----Petitioner
Versus
- State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
- Madan Lal S/o Jaskaran Saini, B/c Mali, R/o Ladnoon Bypass Road, Sujangarh, District Churu.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP Mr. Navneet Poonia
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Judgment / Order
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the conviction and sentence under Section 138 NI Act can be set aside upon entering into a compromise between the parties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohammad Arif S/o Haji Mohammad Isak Khinchi
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
- respondent
Madan Lal S/o Jaskaran Saini
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/231/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court