This court granted leave to appeal against an acquittal of respondents. The application for leave was allowed, the memo was treated as an appeal, and the record was noted. The second respondent was directed to appear and furnish bail bonds.
Application for leave to appeal allowed; memo treated as appeal and registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 136/2018
Rajvardhan Vaishnav
----Appellant
Versus
State And Anr
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Ms. Deepika Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. Muktiyar Khan PP Mr. Naresh Khatri
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
07/11/2019
Heard learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the respondent and perused the judgment impugned.
This Court is of the opinion that there are valid and substantial grounds for grant of leave for filing an appeal against the acquittal of the respondents vide impugned judgment.
Accordingly, the application for grant of leave to appeal is allowed. The memo of leave to appeal be treated as an appeal and it be registered as such.
Admit. Record of the case has already been received.
Accordingly the respondent No.2 is directed to mark his presence before the Registrar (Judl.) on or before 09.12.2019 and furnish bail bonds in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with a surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Registrar(Judl.), Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
41-Anshul/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant leave to appeal against an acquittal.
Rajvardhan Vaishnav
State
Respondent No.2
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
