Allowed

Premsingh S/O Batturam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Dec 2019CRLMB/14425/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a First Information Report accused, upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each. Specific conditions regarding interrogation, inducement, and leaving India were imposed.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted conditioned upon personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each and adherence to specified conditions.

Premsingh S/O Batturam Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14425/2019

¶3

Premsingh S/o Batturam, Aged About 40 Years, B/c Jatab R/o Village Sasedi P.s. Sadar Karauli District Karauli Rajasthan.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, P.P.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR

¶10

Order

¶11

05/12/2019

¶12

This bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 234/2019 registered at P.S. Kotwali Distt. Karauli for the offences mentioned therein against the applicant, whereupon the investigation was commenced. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner moved the bail application before the court below, which was dismissed. Hence, this bail application has been filed.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor perused the material made available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the owner of the vehicle, petitioner has no connection with the fake driving license of driver-Lakhan. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by all such conditions which this Court deems just and proper.

¶15

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-14425/2019]

¶17

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for applicant, note of the allegations levelled against the applicant as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. Therefore, this bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Premsingh S/o Batturam in the aforesaid FIR, he shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:

¶18

i) That the petitioner shall make himself/herself available for interrogation before the police officer, as and when required;

¶19

ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;

¶20

iii) That the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court;

¶21

iv) That the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused or suspected.

¶22

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J

¶23

Ashu/5

Premsingh S/O Batturam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Premsingh S/O Batturam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Kumar Singhi S/O Shri Poonam Chand Singhi Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh Meena S/O Late Shri Ramnath Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Gopal S/O Chothu B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu S/O Shri Brijender Singh B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan

Sukhram Gurjar S/O Shri Nandlala B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Deepak Jangid Son of Shri Chaturbhuj Jangid Vs State of Rajasthan