Allowed

Deepak Jangid Son of Shri Chaturbhuj Jangid v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Dec 2019CRLMB/14102/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C to Deepak Jangid in connection with FIR No. 428/2019. On a petition citing compromise between parties, the court directed his release on bail if arrested, subject to a personal bond and sureties along with standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail subject to personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each upon arrest.

Deepak Jangid Son of Shri Chaturbhuj Jangid Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14102/2019

¶3

Deepak Jangid Son of Shri Chaturbhuj Jangid, By Caste Khati, Resident of 22A, Keshavpura, Rangbari, Road, Kota.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶7

		----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. N.S. Dhakad
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Pankaj Agarwal,	P.P.
For Complainant(s)	Mr. G.K. Sharma

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR

¶9

Order

¶10

05/12/2019

¶11

This bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 428/2019 registered at P.S. Mahaveer Nagar Distt. Kota City for the offences mentioned therein against the applicant, whereupon the investigation was commenced. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner moved the bail application before the court below, which was dismissed. Hence, this bail application has been filed.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available on record.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no allegation against the petitioner regarding the assault and parties have arrived at compromise. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by all such conditions which are to be imposed by this Court.

¶14

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Counsel for the complainant does not controvert the statement of counsel for the applicant regarding the compromise.

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-14102/2019]

¶16

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for applicant, note of the allegations levelled against the applicant as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant.

¶17

Therefore, this bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Deepak Jangid Son of Shri Chaturbhuj Jangid in the aforesaid FIR, he shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:

¶18

i) That the petitioner shall make himself/herself available for interrogation before the police officer, as and when required;

¶19

ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;

¶20

iii) That the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court;

¶21

iv) That the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused or suspected.

¶22

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J

¶23

Ashu/4

Deepak Jangid Son of Shri Chaturbhuj Jangid v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Jangid Son of Shri Chaturbhuj Jangid v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Kumar Singhi S/O Shri Poonam Chand Singhi Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh Meena S/O Late Shri Ramnath Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Gopal S/O Chothu B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu S/O Shri Brijender Singh B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan

Sukhram Gurjar S/O Shri Nandlala B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Premsingh S/O Batturam Vs State of Rajasthan