This High Court allowed a bail petition under Section 439 CrPC without expressing an opinion on merits, directing the petitioner's admission to bail subject to the Trial Court's satisfaction.
Petitioner admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11954/2019
Nandu@nandkishor@nitin S/o Vidyadhar, B/c Brahman R/o Vill. Hathiya Ps Barsana Dist. Mathura (Up) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola for the State
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Judgment / Order
23/10/2019
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. 316/2005 registered at Police Station Deeg, Distt. Bharatpur, for offences under Sections 379, 411 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Head.
Although, petitioner had jumped bail but now he is in custody since 04.04.2019.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioner be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the Trial Court.
Sudha/79
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant regular bail to a petitioner who had previously jumped bail but has been in custody since 04.04.2019.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nandu
State Of Rajasthan
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
