Single judge order disposing a writ petition in contempt. The High Court noted an unconditional apology by respondents and found the petitioner ineligible, thus discharging contempt notices and dismissing the petition without proceeding.
Notices of contempt discharged; Petition disposed of for statistical purposes
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 864/2018
Rajesh S/o Sh. Shri Rampal Harijan, Resident Of Indira Colony, Kankroli, District Rajsamand Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chaitanya Gahlot. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashwant Mehta. Mr. Sunil Joshi on behalf of Mr. Rajesh Panwar, AAG.
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
13/11/2018
Mr. Sunil Joshi appears for respondents No.1 & 3 while Mr. Yashwant Mehta appears for respondent No.2. The service is thus complete.
Learned counsel for the respondents-contemnors submits that pursuant to the order dated 07.12.2017, passed by this Court, the petitioner’s representation has been decided and petitioner has been found ineligible. A copy of the said decision dated 15.6.2018 has been placed on record along with the reply.
(2 of 2)
[WCP-864/2018]
Though there is a delay in deciding the representation, however, looking to the unconditional apology tendered by the respondents-contemnors and as the petitioner has been found ineligible, this Court is not inclined to proceed with the contempt petition.
Notices of contempt are hereby discharged.
The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical
purposes.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
A.Arora/-33.
Rajesh S/o Sh. Shri Rampal Harijan
Shri Mukesh Kumar
Shri Brijesh Rai
State Of Rajasthan
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
