In this writ contempt petition, the Court held the matter infructuous upon counsel's statement. Notices of contempt were discharged, and the petition was disposed of for statistical purposes only with no substantive decisions rendered.
Not applicable as the petition was disposed of for statistical purposes only with notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 59/2018
Mamta Devi W/o Moti Lal, By Caste Jat, R/o Mwm, Anandgarh, Tehsil Khajuwala, District Bikaner Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sharvan Saini Mr. Sunil Joshi for Mr. Rajesh Panwar,AAG
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order
03/10/2018
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner informs that the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of statement so made, this Court is not inclined to proceed with the contempt petition.
Notices of contempt are hereby discharged.
(2 of 2)
[WCP-59/2018]
The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical
purposes.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
Himanshu/-26
Mamta Devi W/o Moti Lal
State Of Rajasthan
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
