The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur, in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9926/2017, dismissed a writ petition filed by a firm as having become infructuous due to subsequent developments.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9926/2017
Firm Maloo Variety Store, Main Market, Near Ghantaghar, Durga Market, Rajgarh, District- Churu, Through its Proprietor Nirmal Kumar Maloo S/o Shri Kanhaiyalal Ji, By Caste- Maloo, aged about 48 years, Resident Of Near Maharana Pratap Chouk, Rajgarh, District- Churu, Rajasthan, India.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Niraj Kumar Jain. For Respondent(s) : None present.
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
15/11/2018
Mr. Niraj Kumar Jain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the wake of subsequent development, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
A.Arora/-50.
Firm Maloo Variety Store, Through its Proprietor Nirmal Kumar Maloo
Anand Surana
Municipal Board, Rajgarh
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
