Petitioner withdrew the contempt petition due to subsequent developments. The High Court discharged the notices and disposed of the petition for statistical purposes.
Notices of contempt discharged; record disposed for statistical purposes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 732/2018
Reena D/o Shri Rajveer Singh, R/o House No. 18E/499, Chopasani Housing Board, Nandanvan, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat on behalf of Mr. Kailash Jangid. For Respondent(s) : -
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Judgment
14/11/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent development, he does not wish to prosecute the present contempt petition.
The request so made is acceded to.
(2 of 2)
[WCP-732/2018]
Notices of contempt are, hereby, discharged.
The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical
purposes.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
A.Arora/-29.
Reena D/o Shri Rajveer Singh
Shri Naveen Mahajan
Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar
Shri P.c. Kishan
Shri Ganwade Pradeep Keshavrav
Shri Bramanand Sharma
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
