Held that the dispute has already been adjudicated in Daulat Ram case. The writ petition is allowed with directions identical to the earlier judgment to reimburse entire dues of retired employees within six months with interest.
Respondents directed to reimburse entire dues of retired employees within six months with interest at 6% p.a.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 8024/2018
Ram Karan Saran Son Of Shri Shivji Ram, By Caste Saran, Resident Of Village Post Piplad, Via Parbatsar, District Nagaur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.C. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suniel Purohit
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
Order
07/08/2018
It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court in Daulat Ram Vs. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided on 01.10.2015) and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.
This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra), directed as under:-
“In this background, these writ petitions deserve to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to the concerned officers
(2 of 2) [CW-8024/2018]
to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of dues at the earliest.
No order as to costs.”
In view of above, this writ petition is also allowed in light of the judgment in case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions, as quoted hereinbefore.
(P.K. LOHRA),J
Anil Kumar Choudhary/6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition requiring reimbursement of retired employees dues should be disposed of in light of the earlier judgment in Daulat Ram.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Daulat Ram Vs. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors.Relied on¶13
Daulat Ram Vs. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided on 01.10.2015)
Ram Karan Saran Son Of Shri Shivji Ram, By Caste Saran, Resident Of Village Post Piplad, Via Parbatsar, District Nagaur
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
The Chief Manager, Dungarpur Depot, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
P.K. LOHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
