Manjula v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order allowing a writ petition on past payment fixation issue relying on a prior bench order directing respondents to follow specific rules for pay fixation.
Single judge order allowing a writ petition on past payment fixation issue relying on a prior bench order directing respondents to follow specific rules for pay fixation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 4779/2018
Manjula Daughter Of Sh. Hansram, Resident Of VPO Abusar, District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. KR Saharan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikas Choudhari for Mr. S.S. Ladrecha, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
Order
07/08/2018
Issue notice.
Mr. Vikas Choudhary appearing on behalf of S.S. Ladrecha,
AAG, accepts notice.
(2 of 2)
[CW-4779/2018]
It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the issue raised in present writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in Dhanraj Meena v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12846/2017, decided on 15.1.2018), and therefore, the present writ petition may also be decided in light of the said order.
In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed in light of order passed by this Court in Dhanraj Meena (supra) with similar directions, which reads as
under:-
“In view thereof, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners are allowed, as the petitioners have already been relieved pursuant to the interim orders passed by this Court, the said interim orders passed by this Court directing to relieve the petitioners are made absolute.
It is further directed that the respondents while dealing with the cases of the petitioners pertaining to their pay fixation etc. would follow the provisions of Rules 24 and 26 of the RSR as per law.
In cases where the petitioners have been relieved provisionally under the directions of this Court, the Authorities would pass appropriate orders pertaining to relieving of the petitioners along with their last pay certificate (L.P.C.), where they were serving earlier.”
Bharti/37
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dhanraj Meena v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Relied on¶25
Dhanraj Meena v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12846/2017, decided on 15.1.2018)
Manjula
State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Rural And Panchayati Raj Department
Zila Parishad, Nagaur
Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti
P.K. Lohra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court