Petitioner's writ petition disposed of by adjourning to file representation before competent authority within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 10868/2018
Madhubala Vaishnav W/o Shri Om Prakash Vaishnav, aged about 53 Years, F-218, R.k. Colony, Bhilwara (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Usman Ghani.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
Order
07/08/2018
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for his afflictions, ventilated in the writ petition, petitioner wants to submit a detailed representation before competent authority.
In view thereof, the petition is disposed of with the expectation that competent authority shall consider and decide representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible,
(2 of 2)
[CW-10868/2018]
strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of its receipt.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(P.K. LOHRA),J
a.asopa/-10
Madhubala Vaishnav
State of Rajasthan
Manju Sharma
P.K. LOHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
