Allowed
Ghanshyam Das Vaishnava v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
Rajasthan HCCW/11853/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.…
What the court decided
AI extract
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 11853/2018
Ghanshyam Das Vaishnava S/o Shri Moti Das, Aged About 60 Years, By Caste Vaishnava, Village Post Sanwar, Near Narsingh Temple, Tehsil Mavli, District Udaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.C. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suniel Purohit
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
Order
29/08/2018
It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court in Daulat Ram Vs. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided on 01.10.2015) and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.
This Court, while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra), directed as under:-
“In this background, these writ petitions deserve to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry
(2 of 2)
[CW-11853/2018]
interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to the concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of dues at the earliest.
No order as to costs.”
In view of above, this writ petition is also allowed in light of the judgment in case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions, as quoted hereinbefore.
(P.K. LOHRA),J
Anil Kumar Choudhary/18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition should be disposed of in the light of the earlier judgment Daulat Ram Vs. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Daulat Ram Vs. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors.Relied on¶13
Daulat Ram Vs. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided on 01.10.2015)
Ghanshyam Das Vaishnava
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
P.K. LOHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court