Petition claims coverage by prior orders. Court disposes petition in terms of Manoj Kumar Natwaria and Narendra Singh cases decided on 9.5.2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 10986/2018
Vijendra Kumar S/o Ghasi Ram, R/o Vill Gadhwalon Ki Dhani, Post Bajawa Rawato Ka, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deshraj Kalwania For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
21/05/2018
Representative of the petitioner has submitted that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the order dated 17.5.2017 passed by this Court while deciding bunch of writ petitions, lead case being Kashi Ram vs. Union of India & Anr. SBCWP No.2867/2017, along with Manoj Kumar Natwaria vs. UOI & Ors. , SBCWP No.3317/2016 and Narendra Singh vs. SSC , SBCWP No.3858/2012.
As prayed, the present writ petition is disposed off, in same terms, as in the case of Manoj Kumar Natwaria vs. UOI & Ors. , SBCWP No.3317/2016 and Narendra Singh vs. SSC , SBCWP No.3858/2012, decided on 9.5.2017, along with bunch of writ petitions, lead case being Kashi Ram vs. Union of India & Anr . SBCWP No.2867/2017.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.
SS/260
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kashi Ram vs. Union of India & Anr.Followed¶13
Kashi Ram vs. Union of India & Anr. SBCWP No.2867/2017
Manoj Kumar Natwaria vs. UOI & Ors.Followed¶13
Manoj Kumar Natwaria vs. UOI & Ors. SBCWP No.3317/2016
Narendra Singh vs. SSCFollowed¶13
Narendra Singh vs. SSC SBCWP No.3858/2012
Vijendra Kumar S/o Ghasi Ram
Union Of India
Secretary, Staff Selection Commission (U.o.i.)
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
