The perusal of the statements of the co-accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. shows that Deshraj had kept wife of Lalchand and that was the reason for enmity between the parties. No doubt, it is true that no injury has been caused to Deshraj but it is to his brother Jugraj, who died in the incident. Apart from this. '3 y- I "$ + 5 jari&s, thus merely for the reason % " @ p injury, motive &mot be ignored k8,?rf:8+P :&. .", @p.?.. % @2;x2 when the ffEeceased is none-else but real brother,,@?f) Deshraj. ' ."' Jg v." 3 $ Y;@".) ;: When one party takes revenge, it may not be againsVf only the person with whom t can be with the family lh -141 :7 S - Ev,.., _#&.sY"_ $ members as well. T $$&@@~:kh,rs; , ,.~b%@& a. a<, &j%Gd:s:qpw2; "!"&+A' " ". ? case is-coming out from the ;&, i $3~ &&$$?%, &< ? 4' * " " , "!$* * y .$ ; ., .. iz.) >& .4 >~a:j!*$;p;.f~<~~> %, -, % ,. %,$ %&. statements of the c $$nh&~k **'.W :a<,** .. . **.a** " gCf **ij** 3 1 **_3_** c rm p. c , its 1 fa P%P.; &>"& _$a&?#_ & the statements of the eye-witnesses. They ha accused were equipped with weapon and wer mplainant party. The premeditation of t en proved by the prosecution. The co 'k u&<-w. -* iw-.. In the occurrence, ~eq;pqrfianof.ihap& 2, 4 "1, " w 'p %do +... sustained injuries but evidence on record proves motive and the common object to cause the occurrence. The appellant actively participated in the incident.
