In a contempt petition, the court disposed of the matter by relying on a previous judgment in Shankar Lal Choudhary Vs. Shri Rajesh Yadav, applying its observations mutatis mutandis without independent reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
ORDER
(S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.811/2018)
Chandra Prakash Chaturvedi S/o late Shri Salig Ram Sharma, aged about 63 years r/o Plot No.1-A, Adarsh Basti Rampura Rupa, behind Post Office, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur.
...Petitioner
Versus
...Respondents
Date of Order:
July 09, 2018.
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Mr. Jeetendra Kumar Sharma, for the petitioner. Mr. Vinayak Joshi, for respondents.
BY THE COURT :
Counsel for the parties submit that the issue agitated in this contempt petition is fully covered by the judgment of this court in the case of Shankar Lal Choudhary Vs. Shri Rajesh Yadav, SBCCP No.1500/2016 decided on 6-7-2018.
In view of the joint prayer made by counsel for the parties, this
contempt petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this court in the case of Shankar Lal Choudhary (supra). The observation/ direction in the aforesaid judgment shall apply mutatismutandis to the case of the petitioner.
(Alok Sharma), J.
arn/
2
All corrections made in the order have been incorporated in the order being emailed.
Arun Kumar Sharma, Private Secretary.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shankar Lal Choudhary Vs. Shri Rajesh Yadav, SBCCP No.1500/2016Followed¶17
Chandra Prakash Chaturvedi
Umesh Kumar
Kuldeep Ranka
Alok Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
