Defenders in a contempt petition submitted that the underlying representation was decided in the petitioner's favor, rendering the contempt petition infructuous. The Court disposed of the matter.
Petition disposed of; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 580/2018
[CCP-580/2018]
(2 of 4)
I8. AJAY MATHUR S/O G. M. MATHUR, WOKKING AS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CONFED, JAIPUR, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/OG/332 S.F.S., MANSAROVAR JAIFUR
[CCP-580/2018]
(3 of 4)
ABOUT 55 YEARS, BY CASTE RAJPUT, /O- 6- GOPAL VIHAR FIRST POLICE LINE BARAN ROAD, KOTA.
...Petitioner Versus
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr.Rahul Kamwar |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr.Ashish Sharma for Mr.Rajendra |
| Prasad, AAG |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Order
06/07/2018
Mr.Ashish Sharma for Mr.Rajendra Prasad, AAG, counsel for the respondent submits that compliance with the order dated
[CCP-580/2018]
(4 of 4)
27.10.2017 passed by the Court in SBCWP No.18950/2017 having been made, inasmuch as the representation filed pursuant thereto has been decided to the petitioner’s benefit.
In this view of the matter, this contempt petition has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly disposed of. Notices are discharged.
(ALOK SHARMA), J
Himanshu/95
Vijay Kumar Sharma and others
State of Rajasthan
Allok Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
