The Single Judge in the High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the SDL/Contempt Petition for non-prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite the case being taken up in the second round.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JAIPUR BENCH
ORDER
(S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.1054/2018)
Saraswati Colony, Purani Basti, Jaipur (Raj.)
...Petitioner
Versus
...Respondents
Date of Order: July 06, 2018.
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
None for the petitioner.
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, even though the case has been taken up in second round. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in agitating the issue raised in the petition.
The petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Notices are discharged.
(Alok Sharma), J.
arn/
2
All corrections made in the order have been incorporated in the order being emailed.
Arun Kumar Sharma, Private Secretary.
Brij Mohan S/o Shri Nathu Lal, Rajesh S/o Shri Lal Chand, mal Chand S/o Shri Mohanlal, Ratan S/o Shri Moolchand, Mahesh S/o Shri Gopallal
Shri Ravi Jain, Commissioner (Personnel), Municipal Corporation, Jaipur
The State of Rajasthan through the director Local Bodies, jaipur
Alok Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
