This contempt petition challenging the rejection of a representation by an order dated 5.4.2018 was disposed of as infructuous because the petitioners did not appear to deny the rejection, rendering the proceeding moot. The court discharged the contempt notices.
Contempt petition disposed of as infructuous; contempt notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 267 / 2018
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narpat Singh,Dy SP, Bhilwara
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Order
30/05/2018
Contempt of the order dated 5.4.2016 in S.B. Civil Writ
Petition No. 2950/2016 is alleged in this petition.
A reply to the contempt petition has been filed stating
that representation received from the petitioners pursuant to the
court’s order was considered and rejected vide order dated
5.4.2018. Therefore, no contempt as alleged is made out and
(2 of 2)
CCP-267/2018]
contempt petition has been rendered infructuous.
None appears for the petitioners to deny the fact that
petitioners’ representation has been rejected vide order dated
5.4.2018.
In view of above, contempt petition is disposed of as
infructuous. Contempt notices stand discharged. However, the petitioners, if aggrieved, would be at liberty to challenge the order dated 5.4.2018, by which their representation has been rejected,
in accordance with law.
(ALOK SHARMA),J.
DK
Shokat Ali
Bhanwar Khan
Mr. Devendra Bhushan Gupta
Mr. Pradeep Mohan Sharma
The State of Rajasthan
Allok Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
