Dismissed

Bore Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Ltd. v. State and Ors.

Rajasthan HC3 Aug 2017CW/13524/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner cooperative society filed a writ petition challenging the re-determination of share money by the Registrar. The proceedings became infructuous due to a fresh order by the Registrar, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek relaxation in deposit.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to approach Registrar for relaxation in depositing share money.

Bore Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Vs State and Ors. — Cooperative Societies | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13524 / 2015

¶3

Bore Gram Sewa Sehkari Samiti Limited, Bore through its Manager Sh. Mangi Lal S/o Bharmal Ram, Aged about 34 years, By caste Vishnoi, Resident of Village Manaki, Village Panchayat-Chainpura (Chhotimana), Panchayat Samiti Dhorimanna, District Barmer.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan through the Secretary to the Government, Department of Co-Operative, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Jaipur.

¶8

The Barmer Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Barmer.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harish Purohit

¶11

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Panwar, AAG assisted by Mr. Sunil Joshi

¶12

Mr. Kuldeep Mathur

¶13

Mr. Siddarth Karvasara

¶14

Mr. Parvat Singh Rathore

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

¶16

Order

¶17

03/08/2017

¶18

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-society essentially being aggrieved with the order dated 09.07.2015 passed by the Registrar, Co-Operative, Societies, Jaipur, whereby the percentage of share money charged by the petitioner-society is re-determined.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner-society has submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, the Registrar, Co-

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

Operative Societies again re-determined the percentage of share money charged by the petitioner-society vide another order dated 09.05.2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner-society has, therefore, submitted that in view of the issuance of the order dated 09.05.2016, the challenge of the petitioner-society to the earlier order dated 09.07.2015 has become infructuous.

¶22

However, learned counsel for the petitioner-society has submitted that in this writ petition, this Court vide order dated 23.11.2015 has ordered that the respondents may not take any coercive action against the petitioner-society pursuant to the Annex.-2 and other orders, the petitioner-society has not deposited the percentage of share money with the respondents till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner-society has, therefore, submitted that liberty be granted to petitioner-society to move appropriate representation before the Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Jaipur to grant relaxation in depositing of the percentage of share money, which the petitioner-society has not deposited till date.

¶23

Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection if such liberty is granted to the petitioner-society.

¶24

Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

¶25

Stay petition also stands dismissed.

¶26

(VIJAY BISHNOI)J.

¶27

Taruna

Bore Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Ltd. v. State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bore Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Ltd. v. State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Kumar Saini Vs State and Ors.

Amrik Singh Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Suresh Kumar Saini Vs State and Ors.

Lukhu Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Vs State and Ors.

Bherudi Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Vs State and Ors.

Rupal Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Local Self and Ors.