The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the inaction of the RTI machinery in deciding an appeal filed by the petitioner. The court directed the State Information Commission to decide the pending appeal expeditiously.
The court directed the State Information Commission to decide the petitioner's pending appeal expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civl Writ Petition No. 14558 / 2016
Suresh Kumar Saini Son of Sita Ram Saini, Aged About 33 Years, Resident of Ward No. 30, Churu, District- Churu.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Kumar Saini
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
02/08/2017
The petitioner has filed this writ petition being aggrieved with the action of the petitioner not giving information to him under the Right to Information Act.
As per the petitioner the appeal preferred by the petitioner before the State Information Commission is pending for consideration since 2016 and the same has not been decided.
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the material available on record, this writ petition is
(2 of 2)
disposed of and it is expected that the State Information Commission shall consider and decide the appeal of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law expeditiously.
(VIJAY BISHNOI)J.
Gaurav/20
Suresh Kumar Saini
The State of Rajasthan Through the Rajasthan State Information Commission
Superintendent of Police, Churu
Public Information Officer, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Churu Division
VIJAY BISHNOI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
