Disposed

Bhagwan Singh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC2 Mar 2017CW/1329/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of a writ petition concerning transfer and posting of a government teacher. The court directed the petitioner to file a comprehensive representation enclosing copies of two coordinate bench orders. The State-respondents were directed to consider and decide on this representation via a reasoned order within six weeks from its receipt.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to file comprehensive representation within two weeks; State-respondents to consider and decide by reasoned order within six weeks of receipt.

Bhagwan Singh Vs State of Raj and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 1329 / 2017

¶3

Bhagwan Singh Son of Shri Raghuveer Singh, Aged About 50 Years, Village Ailau, Post Dhana Khedli, Tehsil- Roopwas, DistrictBharatpur. (Raj) At Present Posted At Teacher Grade-III (Level-I) At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Ganwadi, Block Kaman, DistBharatpur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan Through Its Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Secretariat,, Jaipur (Raj)

¶7

District Education Officer, Secondary Education First,, Bharatpur.

¶8

District Education Officer, Elementary Education,, Bharatpur.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.K. Tiwari

¶11

For Respondent(s) :

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶13

Order

¶14

02/03/2017

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the controversy raised in the instant writ application is with reference to transfer and posting and at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner within a time frame in the backdrop of adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Bhagwana Ram Versus State & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 6272/2016, decided on 24^th August, 2016.

¶16

Referring to another order made in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 12450/2016 (Harishankar Verma Versus State of

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-1329/2017]

¶19

Rajasthan & Ors.), disposed off on 3^rd October, 2016, learned counsel would submit that the State-respondents therein were directed to consider the representation with reference to mutual transfer or transfer on the ground of illness and in the eventuality where the vacancies existed without any compromise on administrative exigency.

¶20

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation enclosing the copies of the orders in the cases of Bhagwana Ram and Harishankar Verma (supra), within two weeks hereinafter.

¶21

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶22

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶23

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶24

SS/57

Bhagwan Singh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagwan Singh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balwant Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Banney Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Guddi Sharma and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Meena Vs Babulal and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar @ Raju Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Bhag Chand Jain Vs State of Raj and Ors.