Rajasthan High Court granted anticipatory bail to three accused petitioners under Section 438 CrPC, directing them to secure bail bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each and appear before the trial court as required.
Anticipatory bail granted under Section 438 CrPC with conditions for furnishing bail bonds worth Rs. 1,00,000 and Rs. 50,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ORDER
S.B.Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 802 / 2017
----Accused/Petitioners
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
----Respondent
vkns'k fnukad% 23-01-2017
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh cuokjh yky 'kekZ
Jh euh"k xqIrk] vf/koDrk& izkFkhZx.k dh vksj lsA Jh thrsUnz Jhekyh] yksd vfHk;kstd okLrs jkT;A
vfHk;qDr&izkFkhZx.k us viuh tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds v/khu iqfyl Fkkuk& eq.Mkoj] ftyk&vyoj esa iathc) dh x;h izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 237@2016 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 457] 380 Hkk-na-la- ds lEcU/k esa izLrqr fd;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k us fuosnu fd;k gS fd izkFkhZx.k fnukad 29-09-2016 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSaA vkjksfir vijk/k izFke Js.kh n.Muk;d }kjk fopkj.kh; gSA vr% mUgsa tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkosA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr rdksaZ dk fojks/k djrs gq, tekur vkosnu vLohdkj fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
2
lquk x;k rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k djk;h x;h lkexzh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA
izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k djk;h x;h lkexzh dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, eSa izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vfUre jk; O;Dr fd;s fcuk vfHk;qDr&izkFkhZx.k dks /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr ikrk gwaA
vr% vfHk;qDr&izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr ;g tekur dk izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn vfHk;qDr&izkFkhZx.k 1- lrh'k iq= Jh pqUuhyky fuoklh ftyk&vyoj] 2- jktdqekj iq= Jh daojflag] fuoklh ftyk&vyoj rFkk 3- vkseizdk'k mQZ dkyw iq= Jh iIiw fuoklh iqfyl Fkkuk&gluiqj ftyk&ikyor ¼gfj;k.kk½ izR;sd }kjk :i;s 1]00]000@& ¼,d yk[k :i;s ek=½ dk Lo;a dk ca/k i= rFkk :i;s 50]000@& & 50]000@& ¼ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s ek=½ :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr fopkj.k U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V dh is'k dh tkos] rks mUgsa izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 237@2016 iqfyl Fkkuk& eq.Mkoj] ftyk&vyoj ls lEcfU/kr izdj.k esa bl 'krZ ds lkFk tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkos fd os izdj.k dh lquokbZ ds nkSjku U;k;ky; }kjk cqyk;s tkus ij mifLFkr gksrs jgsaxsA
¼cuokjh yky 'kekZ½ U;k;kf/kifr
feRry@48
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC.
Whether bail should be granted with directions to appear before the trial court.
Satish Son of Shri Chunnilal
Rajkumar Son of Shri Kanwar Singh
Omprakash @ Kalu Son of Shri Pappu
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
Jh euh"
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
